A Mumbai court recently acquitted one Manisha Chudasama and her fiance Rajesh Panwar of charges related to abetting the suicide of Nitin Keni, her former boyfriend. The decision was made on February 29, where the court made significant observations regarding the moral implications of romantic relationships and their legal repercussions.

The case stemmed from the tragic death of Nitin Keni, who was found hanging in his house on January 15, 2016. Despite efforts to save him, Keni was declared dead upon arrival at the hospital.

Additional sessions judge, N P Mehta emphasized that while it might be morally questionable to switch partners according to one’s whims and fancies, there exists no legal remedy for individuals facing rejection in relationships.

The judge elucidated that to establish abetment under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, there must be active suggestion, instigation, or encouragement from the accused leading to the deceased’s suicide. Mere emotional distress caused by a breakup does not constitute abetment, according to the court.

The prosecution argued that Chudasama and Panwar had mentally tortured Keni, ultimately driving him to suicide. It was revealed that Keni was in a relationship with Chudasama, who later ended it and became engaged to Panwar. The defense countered by stating that Keni had been stalking Chudasama, leading her to file a police complaint against him.

The court analyzed the evidence presented and concluded that while Keni was undoubtedly upset and mentally disturbed upon learning about Chudasama’s new relationship, this circumstance alone should not have driven him to take his own life.

In his ruling, Judge Mehta underscored the importance of considering the nuances of emotional distress in cases involving suicide. While acknowledging the gravity of the situation, the court found insufficient evidence to convict Chudasama and Panwar of abetting Keni’s suicide.